EigenForge AI Labs Talk to us
A long service counter with tickets flowing along it, some stamped and some held for a person

Service operations

The desk you already have, doing the work it was meant to do.

A hundred and eight named outcomes across the twelve domains of IT service management — running on the platform you already own, with every action gated, evidenced and attributable.

Where this runs

Your ITSM estate is the interface.

Nothing here asks you to replace the system of record. The agents work inside it — reading, preparing, routing and evidencing — through the platforms below.

THE TOOLING STAYS. THE CHECKING MOVES OFF THE ENGINEERS.ServiceNowJira Service MgmtBMC Helix · RemedyIvanti NeuronsFreshserviceZendeskManageEngineSalesforce Service CloudONE AUTOMATIONESTATE108 outcomes, twelve domainsone policy over all of themone sealed record per actionthe reviewer’s own templateyourengineersAN MSP RUNNING THREE OF THESE PLATFORMS GETS ONE AUTOMATION ESTATE, NOT THREE
Exhibit 01Eight ITSM platforms, one automation estate. The engineers stay; the queue work changes.
ServiceNowJira Service ManagementBMC Helix and RemedyIvanti NeuronsFreshserviceZendeskManageEngineSalesforce Service Cloud

A worked example

Ten resolved tickets, checked before anyone looks.

A desk closes tickets. An agent re-checks the condition of each one against monitoring, logs and asset state — and only the genuinely resolved are safe to close.

TEN RESOLVED TICKETS, CHECKED BEFORE AN ENGINEER LOOKST-100T-101T-102T-103T-104T-105T-106T-107T-108T-109CLOSED THIS WEEKVERIFIED AGAINST MONITORING,LOGS AND THE ASSET RECORD7 · safe to closenotes and code written for them3 · to an engineertwo still live, one wrong assetEVERY ONE OF THE TEN — NOT A SAMPLEEVERY OVERRIDE THE ENGINEER MAKES IS CAPTURED — AND IS WHAT THE MODEL IS RETRAINED ON
Exhibit 02Of ten resolved tickets: seven verified, two still live, one closed against the wrong asset. Each hold carries its evidence.

How the outcomes get delivered

Native agents work the queue. Your people work the exceptions.

Every one of the hundred and eight outcomes is delivered the same way: an agent senses the work where it arrives — a ticket, an alert, a change window — prepares it completely, passes through the gate that class of action deserves, acts inside the platform, and signs the record. The productivity is not a chatbot on the side of the desk. It is the removal of the reading, chasing, assembling and re-checking that used to consume the desk.

FIG. 1 THE AGENT WORKS THE QUEUE; THE PERSON WORKS THE EXCEPTIONSSENSEPREPAREGATEACTRECORDTHE 108OUTCOMESWHAT CHANGES FOR THE TEAMDEPTH STOPS MATTERINGthe agent reads every ticket, not the top of the queuePREPARATION IS DONEthe person opens a case with the answer alreadyassembledDECISIONS STAY HUMANanything irreversible waits for a named approverFRIDAY IS PROVABLEthe week’s agent work replays as a signed record
Exhibit 03The loop every outcome runs: sense, prepare, gate, act, record. Routine and reversible work flows on its own; anything else waits for a named person.

What the agent automates

Triage and classification on arrival. Enrichment — the user, the asset, the history, the similar cases, assembled before anyone opens the ticket. Routing to the right queue the first time. Resolution of the routine and reversible, end to end. Verification that a “resolved” ticket is resolved in the monitoring, the logs and the asset state — not just in the ticket’s own claim. And the follow-up nobody had time for: knowledge drafted from what was learned.

What your people keep

The decisions. Approvals for anything irreversible or expensive sit with a named person, enforced in the path the action has to travel — not in a guideline. What changes for the team is the shape of the day: the queue’s depth stops mattering because the agent reads all of it, and the person’s judgment is spent on the exceptions, where it was always supposed to be.

The measure we work to is not deflection. It is cost per resolved-and-verified outcome, with the evidence attached — a number your own records produce, before and after.

How to read the catalogue

Every outcome carries a gate and a status.

Auto

Completes within policy — alerts, reminders, routing and low-risk requests.

Approve

Prepares the work; a named person reviews and commits it.

Advise

Analysis and evidence only; nothing happens on the agent's initiative.

Live

Runs in production on the platform today and can be demonstrated on working software.

Component

Assembled from components already in production; the assembly for this use is a scoped build.

Design

Specified with a clear data path but not yet built — scoped as a build, never presented as available.

We will tell you in the same breath which category an outcome is in. A design is scoped as a build and priced as a build — never presented as available.

Domain A · 12 outcomes

Intake and first-line triage

OutcomeGateStatus
A1Category and subcategory correction at intake, with the reason the user's selection changed recordedAutoLive
A2Duplicate and child detection on asset, symptom and time window, then link or mergeApproveLive
A3Priority correction against affected-user count, asset criticality and service map rather than the caller's severityApproveLive
A4Assignment routing on symptom, ownership and resolver history, with its own misroutes reportedAutoLive
A5Missing-information chase, naming the specific field or artefact and holding the clock state correctlyAutoComponent
A6Ticket creation from unstructured email and chat threads, with the evidence attachedAutoComponent
A7Monitoring alert to incident already carrying metric series, asset, recent changes and prior occurrencesAutoLive
A8Alarm storm collapse into one parent, with derived children suppressedAutoLive
A9Major-incident candidate flagging on the pattern that precedes one, before the volume arrivesApproveComponent
A10Language normalisation for offshore desks, original text preserved as the record of truthAutoComponent
A11Contractual and priority-account detection at intake, applying the right handling pathAutoComponent
A12Misdirected request redirection — requests filed as incidents, employee matters filed to IT, security filed to the deskApproveComponent

Domain B · 12 outcomes

Verification and closure quality

OutcomeGateStatus
B1Post-resolution condition check across monitoring, logs and asset state before an engineer looksApproveLive
B2Work-note quality scoring against what a future engineer would need, returning the unusableApproveComponent
B3Close-code accuracy validation against what actually happened, correcting systematic miscodingApproveLive
B4Premature-closure detection by pattern rather than by samplingAdviseLive
B5Reopen prediction, holding the highest-risk closures for a second lookAdviseComponent
B6Resolution-to-knowledge conversion, deduplicated against what exists, for owner approvalApproveComponent
B7Full-population quality review against the rubric, reported by engineer and queueAdviseLive
B8Asset attribution correction at closure, so problem management is not built on noiseApproveComponent
B9Resolution-time integrity check — clock manipulation, back-dating, pending-state abuseAdviseComponent
B10Confirmation chase and close on the substance of the reply rather than on the timerAutoComponent
B11Repeat-caller and repeat-asset detection across separately closed tickets, raising a problem candidateAdviseLive
B12Closure evidence pack — the evidence the decision rested on and the human who approved it, sealedAutoLive

Domain C · 10 outcomes

Request fulfilment and catalogue

OutcomeGateStatus
C1Access request eligibility pre-check against role, entitlement policy and segregation-of-duties rulesApproveComponent
C2Approval chase and stalled-request recovery, reporting which approvers are the structural bottleneckAutoComponent
C3Catalogue item selection help — interpreting what was actually asked forAutoComponent
C4Fulfilment orchestration across systems, reconciling what was granted against what was requestedApproveComponent
C5Licence request against the entitlement pool, reclaiming unused allocationsApproveComponent
C6Joiner, mover and leaver completeness, surfacing tasks silently never completedAdviseComponent
C7Hardware request and stock reality check, offering the approved alternativeAutoDesign
C8Catalogue hygiene analysis — unused items, always-amended items, requests filed outside the catalogueAdviseComponent
C9Recurring manual request detected and the catalogue item and workflow proposedAdviseComponent
C10Recertification packs per manager with usage evidence rather than a bare entitlement listApproveDesign

Domain D · 10 outcomes

Change, release and advisory board

OutcomeGateStatus
D1Change record quality review — real implementation plan, test evidence, rollback plan, correct asset scopeApproveComponent
D2Collision and blackout detection on asset, dependency, window, freeze and business calendarAdviseComponent
D3Risk scoring from what actually failed before on this asset, team and change typeAdviseComponent
D4Board pack with each change summarised, risks named and unanswered questions listedApproveComponent
D5Post-implementation review from monitoring and incident data rather than the implementer's assertionApproveLive
D6Change-to-incident causation linking, quantifying change-induced volume by teamAdviseLive
D7Unauthorised change detection — discovered drift against approved changesAdviseComponent
D8Standard-change candidate identification with the template draftedAdviseComponent
D9Emergency-change justification audit, reporting teams routinely bypassing the boardAdviseComponent
D10Release readiness evidence assembly, blocking the gate when the evidence is absentApproveLive

Domain E · 8 outcomes

Problem management and root cause

OutcomeGateStatus
E1Problem candidate detection from incident clusters, with the problem's cost quantifiedAdviseLive
E2Investigation file assembly — every related incident, change, alert and log excerpt, structuredAdviseLive
E3Workaround coverage check, closing the gap where agents are not applying an existing oneApproveComponent
E4Ageing and ownership pressure, ranked by ongoing incident costAdviseComponent
E5Major incident timeline reconstruction from ticket, chat, alert and change recordsAdviseComponent
E6Remediation action tracking until actually done and evidencedAdviseComponent
E7Recurrence detection after closure, reopening with the comparison attachedAdviseComponent
E8Chronic-asset reporting by total incident cost, for the remediate-or-replace decisionAdviseComponent

Domain F · 10 outcomes

Configuration, discovery and asset

OutcomeGateStatus
F1Discovery-to-record reconciliation, each difference classified as stale, missing or a discovery gapApproveLive
F2Orphan and duplicate resolution to a single governed record with merge evidence retainedApproveLive
F3Service map completeness testing against observed traffic and incident co-occurrenceAdviseComponent
F4Ownership inference from change, incident and access history where the field is wrongApproveComponent
F5Installation to entitlement reconciliation, exposing over-deployment and shelfwareAdviseComponent
F6Lifecycle and refresh planning against end-of-life and warranty exposureAdviseComponent
F7Cloud resource mapping and cost attribution, reclaiming orphansAdviseComponent
F8End-of-support exposure by asset, ranked by service criticalityAdviseComponent
F9Certificate and key expiry control, raising renewal work before the outageAutoLive
F10Health scoring on completeness, accuracy and freshness per class, reporting the trendAdviseLive

Domain G · 8 outcomes

Knowledge management

OutcomeGateStatus
G1Gap detection from ticket volume, with the missing article draftedApproveComponent
G2Stale and contradictory article detection against recent resolutions and decommissioned systemsAdviseComponent
G3Accuracy testing — what articles instruct against what engineers actually didAdviseComponent
G4Duplicate consolidation into one canonical version with redirects preservedApproveComponent
G5Article surfacing inside the ticket with the matching passage highlightedAutoLive
G6Runbook extraction from chat and notes into a reviewable artefactApproveComponent
G7Multi-language variants maintained from the approved source articleApproveComponent
G8Review cycle enforcement with the reviewer's sign-off evidencedAutoDesign

Domain H · 8 outcomes

Self-service, voice and conversational

OutcomeGateStatus
H1Deflection with an actual answer from governed knowledge and live system stateAutoComponent
H2Guided diagnostic before ticket creation, with results recorded on the ticket if one is still neededAutoComponent
H3Status answering from the real downstream state, not the ticket's stage labelAutoLive
H4Permitted self-service actions with identity verification and full loggingAutoComponent
H5Handover to a human with transcript, attempted steps and system state summarisedAutoLive
H6Voice intake over telephony with structured capture and a sub-second response targetAutoLive
H7Proactive notification of a known degradation, sized from the service map, ahead of the call volumeApproveComponent
H8Frustration detection in-conversation, routing to a human before the complaint becomes formalAutoComponent

Domain I · 8 outcomes

Service level, reporting and audit

OutcomeGateStatus
I1Breach prediction with intervention on the reason, not a report after the factApproveLive
I2Service review pack with movement explained and likely questions pre-answeredApproveLive
I3Service credit calculation from governed data, evidenced for both partiesApproveComponent
I4Reporting integrity audit — clock states, reclassifications, backdating, bulk closuresAdviseComponent
I5Cost-to-serve attribution by service, queue and clientAdviseComponent
I6Shift handover briefing with live risks, ageing tickets and open majorsAutoComponent
I7Capacity forecast by queue, skill and shiftAdviseComponent
I8Control evidence in the reviewer's own template, sealed and attributable per actionAutoComponent

Domain J · 8 outcomes

Security operations

OutcomeGateStatus
J1Security incident enrichment and triage with asset, identity, exposure and prior-case contextApproveComponent
J2Vulnerability prioritisation by exploitability, exposure and service criticalityAdviseComponent
J3Remediation task creation and ownership routing with the right team and windowApproveComponent
J4Phishing report triage, clustering the campaign and closing the benign with reasonsApproveComponent
J5Insider-risk signal correlation into a reviewable case rather than isolated alertsAdviseLive
J6Certification exception handling with the revoke-or-retain recommendation preparedApproveDesign
J7Continuous control evidence collection as it happens rather than at audit timeAutoLive
J8Third-party risk review file assembled from questionnaires, contracts and incident historyAdviseComponent

Domain K · 8 outcomes

Employee service delivery

OutcomeGateStatus
K1Policy answering from approved sources only, with the clause cited and a refusal where nothing covers itAutoComponent
K2Onboarding completeness reconciled across functions, surfacing what silently did not happenAdviseComponent
K3Offboarding access and asset assurance — actually revoked and actually returned, with evidenceApproveComponent
K4Document request handling from governed employment data, for approval and releaseApproveComponent
K5Case routing with sensitivity handling and restricted visibility enforced at the data layerAutoComponent
K6Work-pass and right-to-work expiry control, driving renewal before the breachAutoComponent
K7Payroll input query reconciliation against time, leave and pay recordsApproveDesign
K8Case pattern reporting by unit, de-identified where requiredAdviseComponent

Domain L · 6 outcomes

Customer and field service

OutcomeGateStatus
L1Case triage with entitlement and severity verification before a support engineer is consumedAutoComponent
L2Case-to-defect linking with customer impact quantified per defectAdviseComponent
L3Dispatch with skill, parts and geography matching, re-planned on the day's actualsApproveComponent
L4First-time-fix failure analysis — wrong part, wrong diagnosis, wrong skill — each cause quantifiedAdviseComponent
L5Field evidence capture and work verification, offline-first, sync resuming where it droppedAutoLive
L6Warranty and contract reconciliation against work performed, stopping absorbed service costAdviseComponent

Beyond the desk

Platform operations: thirty-four agents in five groups.

The same machinery runs the platform itself — provisioning, monitoring, cost, defensive security and audit.

7

Provisioning and configuration management

Failure classification, corrective commands and rerun from the failed step — with fixed, not-fixed or escalated stated every time.

8

Monitoring, observability and incident response

Correlation across alarms, application errors and logs, so one failure pages once.

4

Cost, capacity and governance

Spend deviations traced to the account, service and recent change responsible.

11

Cybersecurity, defensive only

Posture assessment, vulnerability re-ranking by actual exposure, and security operations that run with no telemetry leaving the network.

4

Audit and compliance reporting

Readable reports in the reviewer's own template, saved as re-runnable scenarios.

The fast-build library

A hundred and fourteen agents across eleven domains.

Reusable agent patterns beyond service management, assembled on the same governed foundation and adapted to each estate.

Service managementFinancial servicesManufacturingSupply chainWater and wastewaterHuman resources and people operationsFinance, accounting and shared servicesLegal, contracts and company secretarialProcurement and sourcingSales and revenue operationsProfessional services and staffing

Pick three outcomes

Tell us which rows of the catalogue hurt most. We will tell you honestly which are live, which are a scoped build, and what each would take on your estate.

hello@eigenforgelabs.ai

Send opens your email client with the note already addressed to us — nothing is stored on this site, and the message goes from your own mailbox, so our reply lands in yours.